Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Dilemma of luxury distribution channels...

Living in Paris, we are surrounded by high-end retailers all the time. There are plenty of luxury department stores, boutiques and branded stores trying to catch our attention. In general we take it as given that we can find brands everywhere. If we want to buy a specific brand, there will always be a store selling it close to us.
Should the same strategy be used for the distribution of high-end jewelry?
In this post I will analyze the route to market for luxury jewelry and how priorities have changed during the past years.

Traditionally, high-end brands 
such as Chopard and Bulgari have very much relied on their relationship with luxury retail partners in the distribution channels to get their jewelry to consumers. It involved some financial advantages for the companies as retailers provided cost for the marketing, real estate and costs associated with store fronts or the retailer’s e-commerce platform.[1]

Another way of traditional jewelry distribution is that major brands opened their own retail stores, focusing on flagship stores in affluent areas or boutiques in high-end hotels. Why are they doing that? Having customers’ focus just on their one brand, companies can create a unique environment that communicates the brand image and offers a better customer experience.


Recently though a new challenge has emerged that might cause conflict within the traditional distribution channels. While exclusivity helps to maintain a luxury brand image and high price points, the market is changing and new ways to generate sales have to be explored: In order to expand the customer base retailer activities are leveraged and companies' own online presences are developed.[2]

Having said this, I want to highlight two challenges that high-end jewelry brands face nowadays: how to avoid channel conflicts and how to create a balanced distribution network?
                                                                                                                                                                    SG

No comments:

Post a Comment